<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>..::B:R:A:D::..</title>
	<link>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog</link>
	<description>The Blog of Brad Chamberlin</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Ubuntu 7.10</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/10/22/78</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/10/22/78#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bradc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/10/22/78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Thursday I installed the latest Ubuntu release (7.10) on my Dell 700m laptop.&#160; Prior that it was running an older Ubuntu release (6.10) up until about two weeks ago when, in anticipation of the new release, I backed up my data and started experimenting with other distributions.&#160; This has pretty much become my ritual [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday I installed the latest Ubuntu release (7.10) on my Dell 700m laptop.&nbsp; Prior that it was running an older Ubuntu release (6.10) up until about two weeks ago when, in anticipation of the new release, I backed up my data and started experimenting with other distributions.&nbsp; This has pretty much become my ritual anymore around the time of Ubuntu releases.&nbsp; I usually alternate which computer I upgrade every release (either the desktop or laptop) so that each computer typically runs on the same release for about a year.</p>
<p>Over the last two weeks I installed Fedora 8 Test 3 and OpenSUSE 10.3.&nbsp; I ran OpenSUSE 10.3 during most of that time and noted several features/improvements that I liked.&nbsp; The first thing I liked was that the new Gtk interface for YaST which significantly makes it feel more at home on a GNOME desktop.&nbsp;&nbsp; It now has the same basic look and feel of Novell&#8217;s GNOME Control Center.&nbsp; I really liked the &#8220;1-Click Install&#8221; feature that OpenSUSE has implemented.&nbsp; Right now 1-Click Install packages are commonly found in the Software Portal at opensuse.org and a few other sites but with time I think they will be popping up all over.&nbsp; Basically when you click to install the software from a website you load a YaST Metadata Package that automatically configures the repositories that are needed for the package and any dependencies.&nbsp; It asks for your root password and away it goes.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Now on to Ubuntu&#8230;This so far has been the best install on this laptop yet (of any distro).&nbsp; Here is a list of a few of the things that I have liked/greatly appreciated in this new release:</p>
<ul>
<li><b>Automatically configured screen resolution to 1280&#215;800:</b>&nbsp; No more adding additional packages, messing around with config files, or running special utilities.&nbsp; </li>
<li><b>Compiz enabled by default.</b>&nbsp; This is a nice addition in my opinion.&nbsp; I have been using Compiz (or Beryl) on both my laptop and desktop systems for a while now and not only is it more visually appealing but believe it or not there are productivity enhancements that I sorely miss when I am on a system without it.&nbsp; Compiz is running extremely well on the laptop, especially considering it has an Intel Integrated Graphics chip in it that is several years old at this point.&nbsp;&nbsp; I also like the fact that they made some sensible decisions regarding the desktop effects defaults.&nbsp;&nbsp;  </li>
<li><b>SD Card Reader works!</b>&nbsp; This is the first time EVER that the integrated SD card reader on this laptop has seen any action.&nbsp; After every install of every distribution I stick a card in this and wait and see what happens&#8230;usually nothing.&nbsp; On this install I stuck an SD card in from my camera after taking some pictures of Ty helping carve some pumpkins and to my amazement and disbelief an SD card icon appeared on my desktop and the import photo&#8217;s dialog&nbsp; popped up on the screen&#8230;very nice!</li>
<li><b>Deskbar/Tracker installed and enabled by default.</b> On the Mac I use Spotlight all of the time&#8230;it&#8217;s almost an addiction&#8230;to find files, applications, etc.&nbsp; On Linux I have grown to love the Deskbar applet for the same reasons.&nbsp; In the past I have always relied on Beagle as the search back-end but the Ubuntu folks have decided to go with Tracker instead.&nbsp; At this point I am not entirely convinced of this but I will give it a try.&nbsp; Deskbar + Beagle/Tracker Live Search plugin rocks.&nbsp; So far what I miss is a feature I have been using A LOT.&nbsp; On my desktop system (and my previous laptop install) I had the Beagle Firefox extension installed which indexed every page I went to.&nbsp; I can&#8217;t tell you how many times just in the last week where I have had to try to find an obscure page that I visited and used Deskbar with Beagle Live plugin to find exactly what I was looking for.&nbsp; I have not, in recent memory, had any issues with system performance and Beagle being enabled, even with the Firefox extension, so only time will tell how well Tracker works.</li>
<li><b>Java packages available in the repositories.</b>&nbsp; Not just any packages, but the most recent updates as well.&nbsp; I was pleasantly surprised to find all of the packages for Java 6 Update 3 in the repositories.&nbsp; They also have a package for Netbeans 5.5 (no 6.0 test releases yet).&nbsp; Given that I have been doing a lot of Java programming for work lately and my IDE of choice is Netbeans this works out extremely well for me.&nbsp; </li>
</ul>
<p>Overall performance has been great, even with Compiz enabled and Tracker running in the background.&nbsp; At least as fast, or faster, than the previous release I had installed on the laptop which was 6.10.&nbsp; </p>
<p>All of this plus the updated versions of all of the usual packages makes 7.10 a very nice release.&nbsp; Now I just have to wait until Friday to get my hands on the next release of OS X.</p>
<p>
<p class="poweredbyperformancing">Powered by <a href="http://scribefire.com/">ScribeFire</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/10/22/78/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogging with ScribeFire</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/08/19/76</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/08/19/76#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 03:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bradc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/08/19/76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since I started blogging I have used many tools to create and publish blog posts.&#160; I have blogged from Writely (now Google Docs), Zoho Writer, Flock, Sun&#8217;s Weblog Publisher for StarOffice/OpenOffice.org, and OOoBlogger.&#160;  Several days ago I discovered a Firefox plugin called ScribeFire and used it to create my last post on Netbeans and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I started blogging I have used many tools to create and publish blog posts.&nbsp; I have blogged from <a href="http://docs.google.com">Writely (now Google Docs)</a>, <a href="http://writer.zoho.com">Zoho Writer</a>, <a href="http://www.flock.com/">Flock</a>, <a href="http://store.digitalriver.com/servlet/ControllerServlet?Action=DisplayPage&amp;Env=BASE&amp;Locale=en_US&amp;SiteID=sunstor&amp;id=ProductDetailsPage&amp;productID=50984800">Sun&#8217;s Weblog Publisher for StarOffice/OpenOffice.org</a>, and <a href="http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/oooblogger/">OOoBlogger</a>.&nbsp;  Several days ago I discovered a Firefox plugin called <a href="http://www.scribefire.com/">ScribeFire</a> and used it to create my last post on Netbeans and the GPL.&nbsp; </p>
<p>After installation an orange notepad icon sits on the bottom of your web browser.&nbsp; Clicking on the icon brings up the ScribeFire interface.&nbsp; As most, if not all, utilities for creating blog entries it has the normal set of formating features and allows you to view the post in either Rich Editing Mode, Source Editing Mode, or Live Preview Mode.&nbsp; </p>
<div align="center"><img src="http://linuxreview.net/blog/wp-content/images/ScribeFire.png" /></p>
</div>
<p>You can select the Tags for your post but there does not appear to be a way to add new Tags from ScribeFire.&nbsp; One nice feature is that it allows you to save notes without publishing them to your blog.&nbsp; A feature I like if I have a quick thought and want to take a quick note.&nbsp; You can then edit and/or publish the notes at any time.&nbsp; Another nice feature is that it allows you to edit any of your older published blog posts as well.&nbsp; I have tested editing older posts and it seems to work well.&nbsp; I tried the same functionality with Sun&#8217;s Weblog Publisher and it screwed up the formatting both times I tried it.&nbsp;&nbsp; Which leads me to another item, it usually seems to provide me with the results that I expect.&nbsp; Too many times with the other tools above I had to log into my blog and edit all of the formatting mistakes that would regularly occur.&nbsp; If you end up logging into your blog to fix mistakes you might as well just create the entire post from there.&nbsp; </p>
<p>So far I really like ScribeFire and I am hoping that over time and more use it won&#8217;t disappoint me.&nbsp; I haven&#8217;t tried Flock&#8217;s blogging capabilities since their initial release so I may give that a try again in the near future, but since I primarily use Firefox it looks like ScribeFire will be my blogging tool of choice.</p>
<p>
<p>Powered by <a href="http://scribefire.com/">ScribeFire</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/08/19/76/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netbeans Adding GPLv2 License?</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/08/17/75</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/08/17/75#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 02:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bradc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/08/17/75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read on David Coldrick&#8217;s blog that Sun is proposing to dual license Netbeans under both the CDDL and GPLv2 licenses.&#160;&#160; He links to this FAQ page on the the Netbeans site.&#160; This is great news for Linux users, such as myself, as this will give distributors the ability to package Netbeans in their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read on <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/coldrick/entry/netbeans_to_have_gplv2_licensing">David Coldrick&#8217;s blog</a> that Sun is proposing to dual license <a href="http://www.netbeans.org/">Netbeans</a> under both the CDDL and GPLv2 licenses.&nbsp;&nbsp; He links to this <a href="http://www.netbeans.org/gplv2-faqs.html">FAQ</a> page on the the Netbeans site.&nbsp; This is great news for Linux users, such as myself, as this will give distributors the ability to package Netbeans in their repositories.&nbsp; This is really great news for me as Netbeans has become my IDE of choice and this will make it even that much easer to acquire.  </p>
<p><b>ScribeFire:</b>&nbsp; I recently discovered <a href="http://www.scribefire.com/">ScribeFire</a>, an awesome plugin for Firefox.&nbsp; This post was created using ScribeFire, more on that later&#8230;</p>
<p>
<p>Powered by <a href="http://scribefire.com/">ScribeFire</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/08/17/75/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ubuntu + Dell</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/05/24/74</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/05/24/74#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 03:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bradc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/05/24/74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just purchased one of the first Dell&#8217;s pre-installed with Ubuntu Linux.  I had several motives for doing so.  The first, and primary, reason for the new computer was that my current work PC here at home has been giving me numerous hardware issues causing the computer to freeze up several times per [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just purchased one of the first Dell&#8217;s pre-installed with Ubuntu Linux.  I had several motives for doing so.  The first, and primary, reason for the new computer was that my current work PC here at home has been giving me numerous hardware issues causing the computer to freeze up several times per day.  I have been debating about getting a new computer for several months now but decided to wait until Dell officially started selling Ubuntu PC&#8217;s to make a decision.</p>
<p>The second reason was that I wanted to show my support monetarily for the decision by Dell to pre-install Ubuntu.   It also doesn&#8217;t hurt that Ubuntu has been my distribution of choice since 5.04 (Hoary Hedgehog).  I really think this has the potential to be a big deal for all of Linux (not just Ubuntu) if it is done right and if the response is significant enough.  It is too easy to simply place a vote for change on a website.  You can vote as much as you want but it means nothing if you don&#8217;t back up your votes with action!</p>
<p>I have every reason to believe at this point that Dell at least has the right idea, or is on the right track.  I have read several articles and blogs, including those on Dell&#8217;s site, that mention that:</p>
<blockquote><p>“We configure/install open source drivers for hardware, when possible.  We use partial open-source or closed source (&#8221;restricted&#8221; in Ubuntu terms) drivers where there is no equivalent open-source driver.”</p></blockquote>
<p>This is a good compromise, it needs to work out of the box or it will just turn new users away.  It is nice to see they understand the value of preferring open source drivers.  The more promising quote though is this:</p>
<blockquote><p>“For hardware options not offered with this release, we are working with the vendors of those devices to improve the maturity and stability of their associated Linux drivers. While this may not happen overnight, we do expect to have a broader range of hardware support with Linux over time.”</p></blockquote>
<p>This is where the real benefit for ALL of Linux comes in.  Working with device vendors to improve the maturity and stability of their Linux drivers could be a substantial boon for Linux in general.   The real downfall will be if very few of the 100,000 people that voted for Linux to be pre-installed on Dell computers actually open their wallets and purchase these machines.</p>
<p>Here are the specs for the machine I just purchased:</p>
<ul>
<li>Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E6420 2.13GHZ</li>
<li>4GB DDR2 SDRAM</li>
<li>256MB nVidia GeForce 7300LE TurboCache</li>
<li>250GB SATA II Hard Drive (7200RPM)</li>
<li>16X DVD+/-RW Drive</li>
<li>Samsung 19IN Wide Screen LCD</li>
<li>and&#8230;..Ubuntu Desktop Edition version7.04!</li>
</ul>
<p>all for $1048 (with $350 off coupon)</p>
<p>I found the coupon I used online and it says that it lasts until May 31, 2007.  If you are in the market for a new computer, specifically one that runs Linux (regardless if you want to run Ubuntu in the end or not) I suggest that you buy one of these Dell&#8217;s as a way of supporting pre-installed Linux and work toward more Linux drivers.  Any significant demand could make a real statement!</p>
<p>The coupon I used was: <strong>$4?HW9L1NB4VTT</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/05/24/74/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft and Advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/02/10/73</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/02/10/73#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 04:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bradc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Other OS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/02/10/73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I have found it absolutely amazing that Microsoft and all it&#8217;s uber-fan-boys have found the Apple “I&#8217;m a Mac, I&#8217;m a PC” ads so objectionable.  People either seem to love them or hate them, hell, Bill Gates doesn&#8217;t even “get” them.   Personally I find most, if not all, of them fairly accurate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><title /></p>
<p>I have found it absolutely amazing that Microsoft and all it&#8217;s uber-fan-boys have found the Apple “I&#8217;m a Mac, I&#8217;m a PC” ads so objectionable.  People either seem to love them or hate them, hell, Bill Gates doesn&#8217;t even “get” them.   Personally I find most, if not all, of them fairly accurate and hilarious.  Have you seen the one with the secret-service-looking guy standing with the “PC” making him deny or allow every action&#8230;<em>”Your slowly coming to a sad realization, deny or allow”</em>&#8230;that gets me every time (see my note below).</p>
<p>The amazing part of it all is that, regardless of how accurate the ads are or are not, Microsoft has no room to talk when questioning the marketing tactics of anyone else.  One only needs to look at Microsoft&#8217;s enormous advertising budget and history of questionable advertising to realize that making a stink out of Apple&#8217;s ads is a little ridiculous.</p>
<p>Microsoft will spend approximately $500 million on advertising the release of Windows Vista alone!  It also spent over $200 million to advertise XP, which in turn was twice as much as they spent to advertise Windows 95.   As <a href="http://www.darrenbarefoot.com/archives/2007/01/500-million-to-advertise-something-youll-eventually-have-to-buy.html">this blog post by Darren Barefoot</a> points out this seems like a lot of money to shell out for a product that a majority of computer users will be <em>forced</em> to buy at some point anyway&#8230;because heaven forbid we be able to choose not to buy Windows when we buy a new PC.   He also aptly points out that the Vista&#8217;s advertising budget is larger than the GDP of 17 countries.  I can tell you this though&#8230;spending more on advertising doesn&#8217;t actually make your product any better.</p>
<p>Talking about ethics or “truth” in advertising&#8230;what about all of those ads from Microsoft&#8217;s famous “Get the Facts” ads?  Most of the research behind the ads are questionable at best and most of it has been Microsoft sponsored.  On top of that (like most marketing) they conveniently manipulate the results to make it look like Windows has some huge advantage over some specific Linux configuration, usually by twisting the numbers or leaving key information out.  My favorite is the one where they compare Windows on an x86 server to an IBM mainframe running just one instance of Linux.</p>
<p>Then there was the bribing bloggers debacle and hiring people to edit Wikipedia entries to favor Microsoft&#8217;s view points and paying people to troll forums to talk down alternatives and hype Microsoft products.  I am not saying that other companies haven&#8217;t done such things but Microsoft definitely has no room to talk.</p>
<p>It makes me wonder why so many of are making such a big deal over the Apple ads?  Could it be that the ads are hitting a nerve with fanboys who are in denial and finally realizing Windows Vista really isn&#8217;t all that spectacular despite, literally, years of hype.  In the end&#8230;I think they all need to just relax anyway and stop taking it so serious.  Maybe Apple needs to come out with a “Get the Facts” campaign of their own.  I can just see it now&#8230;”OS X on a Mac Mini costs 55% less to operate than Vista on a dual processor, dual core, on a high-end Voodoo PC in terms of ease of use.”</p>
<p><strong>NOTE:</strong>  This was extra humorous to me due to the fact that just days before this ad aired for the first time I assisted a friend of mine in installing Vista on his relatively new laptop.  A few days later I asked  my friend what he thought of Vista. His exact response could have been precisely expressed by this Mac ad.  He said&#8230;”It&#8217;s okay, it really annoys me that I have to click through all these damn security dialogs all of the time.”  The very next day this commercial aired and floored me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/02/10/73/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogging from OpenOffice.org</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/01/20/72</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/01/20/72#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 22:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bradc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/01/20/72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while ago I became interested in blogging from OpenOffice.org when Sun released its “Sun Weblog Publisher” several months ago. Weblog Publisher is a, non-free, plugin for StarOffice/OpenOffice.org. Once I saw the announcement I proceeded directly to the Sun website to purchase the plugin. At only $9.95 I thought it was a pretty good deal, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>A while ago I became interested in blogging from OpenOffice.org when Sun released its “Sun Weblog Publisher” several months ago. Weblog Publisher is a, non-free, plugin for StarOffice/OpenOffice.org. Once I saw the announcement I proceeded directly to the Sun website to purchase the plugin. At only $9.95 I thought it was a pretty good deal, meaning not so expensive and I would probably get a lot of use out of it.</p>
<p>After downloading the package I tried it on my laptop running Ubuntu with OpenOffice.org. Unfortunately I could not get it to connect correctly to my blog. I then tried it on several other computers/platforms: Solaris 10, Windows XP, Mac OS X 10.4, and another Linux variant openSuse 10.1, all with OpenOffice.org of course. As my luck would have it none of those configurations worked. I tried it from different networks thinking it might be some weird anomaly with my home network.</p>
<p>I then signed up for a Blogger account and a Wordpress account, I couldn&#8217;t get it to work with those either! At this point I decided to attempt to send an email to the feedback email address supplied for the Weblog Publisher describing my problems and exactly what testing I have done to this point trying to get it to work. That was on October 20th. Later that day I heard back from someone and they asked me several questions about my setup. Then three days later someone else contacted me and requested that I create a temporary account for them on my blog for to test. I did so and sent them the login information. I never heard from anyone again, one way or the other!</p>
<p>Over a month later, on November 27th, I received an email from Sun Microsystems regarding my purchase of the Weblog Publisher. In the email it stated the following:</p>
<p>“ <em>We have found an issue with the Sun Weblog Publisher which occurs when<br />the SWP is used without a proxy server. This is fixed with the new version of the Sun<br />Weblog Publisher which is available now. We are offering the new version to you at no<br />charge for the next thirty days and we strongly recommend that you download the new<br />version even if you have not come across any issues. Please follow the detailed<br />instructions given at the end of this email to download the new version of Sun Weblog<br />Publisher. ”</em></p>
<p>Great! I thought to myself, they have apparently fixed the problem that was frustrating me and they are letting me download the new version at no cost! I eagerly opened Firefox and proceeded to follow the instructions detailed in the email on how to re-download the Weblog Publisher. Of course, I am not that lucky. Once I got to the end of the instructions I was greeted with an error message politely informing me that my 30 day window to download the product had expired.</p>
<p>Bewildered and more than a little disappointed I reread the email again and again to see what sentence I must have misread to lead me to believe that I actually had the opportunity to download the new version. So let me see&#8230;” <em>found issue</em>”&#8230;” <em>fixed with new version</em>”&#8230;” <em>offering the new version to you at no charge</em>”&#8230;” <em>next thirty days</em>”&#8230;” <em>follow instructions</em>”&#8230;well hmmm, sounds okay to me.</p>
<p>There was a link at the bottom of the email to contact someone if you had any problems or questions. So sent them an email explaining that I could not download the new version and asked what I needed to do to get the new version.</p>
<p>The response I got told me that because I had not purchased the “Extended Download Service” when I purchased the Weblog Publisher I was not eligible to download it again and to get the new version I would have to repurchase the item all over again. Funny thing is, I don&#8217;t ever remember seeing an option to purchase any “Extended Download Service”!!! Even so, why in the world would they bother to send me an email (with all my order information) telling me how I can re-download the Weblog Publisher again at no charge? I sent a reply back explaining as much but never received a response.</p>
<p>Just now as I was typing this blog entry on the subject I decided to go to the Sun site and see if there was any kind of “Extended Download Service” available that I might have easily missed. I proceed through the entire order processes and DID NOT SEE ANY SUCH OPTION, it simply does not exist for this product!</p>
<p>Now, to what brought this subject backup in the first place. As I was downloading OpenOffice.org for a family members new computer I was checking out the OOo Extensions wiki and found a link for an  <a href="http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/oooblogger/">OOoBlogger</a> plugin. I just installed it and this blog entry was a test from that extensions.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see how it works&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong>  Unfortunately it only half worked&#8230;the formatting got all screwed up and it doesn&#8217;t let you set your categories. Oh, well&#8230;it will only get better.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2007/01/20/72/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Weekend of Xen&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2006/10/04/69</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2006/10/04/69#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 23:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bradc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2006/10/04/69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;well, a little more than a weekend.  The same weekend that I experimented with Vista I also started experimenting with Xen.  I had briefly experimented with Xen in the past but that was mostly with the Xen LiveCD available at the XenSource website.
[SLES 10]
To start off I figured I would test Xen on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;well, a little more than a weekend.  The same weekend that I experimented with Vista I also started experimenting with Xen.  I had briefly experimented with Xen in the past but that was mostly with the Xen LiveCD available at the XenSource website.</p>
<p><strong>[SLES 10]</strong></p>
<p>To start off I figured I would test Xen on Novell&#8217;s SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 since SLES10 &#8220;&#8230;is the first enterprise platform to include a fully integrated and supported version of Xen 3.0&#8243; and there has been a lot of chatter between Red Hat and Novell about how &#8220;enterprise ready&#8221; Xen really is.  Once installed and booted into the Xen-enabled kernel I as able to use the Xen utility in YaST to get it setup  and create my first image.  The install took, literally, hours to finish which was extremely disappointing.   Once installed I could ssh or VNC into it and make any changes to the system I wanted.  The Xen tools in YaST are extremely bare, not really much too it.   Basically: install, start, stop.   I am assuming they have the more flashy Xen management utilities bundled in their ZenWorks product&#8230;Which is probably what they were demoing last year at BrainShare when they migrated a live image to another physical server without losing connection while streaming a video???</p>
<p><strong>[XenMan on SLES 10]</strong></p>
<p>After the initial install of an instance on Xen using Novell&#8217;s YaST utility I wanted to try the XenMan utility for managing Xen.  I noticed this project a while ago and had it bookmarked in Firefox as something to keep an eye on.  It has more of a VMware-esque interface to it.  It doesn&#8217;t seem that you can just do an install off of a CD/DVD, unless I missed something totally obvious, so first I setup an NFS share of the install source.   After that the install went fairly smoothly as expected, nothing too exciting.  XenMan also recognized my install from the YaST utility so now I had two working installs on top of Xen.</p>
<p><strong>[Red Hat Enterprise 5???]</strong></p>
<p>I did download the beta of RHEL 5 but I found nothing about Xen at all on the DVD.  I did later read that a lot of people who were too anxious to get the beta&#8217;s ended up downloading old images that didn&#8217;t have all the current stuff on it (or something like that?), so I assume that is what happened to me.  After that I didn&#8217;t feel like downloading another whole DVD .iso image.</p>
<p><strong>[XenEnterprise 3.0 from XenSource]</strong></p>
<p>XenEnterprise 3.0 from XenSource was the nicest experience with Xen I have had to date.  During the install you have several options including converting an existing install to  a Xen-capable install or letting XenEnterprise to take over the entire disk with it&#8217;s own minimal Linux install.  I choose to let it take over my disk.  Once installed you need to use the XenEnterprise Administrator Console from another system to manage it.  The Administrator Console is nice!</p>
<p>I setup three Debian guests: Debian-VM01, Debian-VM02, and Debian-VM03.  The first one I used as a webserver, the second a MySQL server, and the third another MySQL server so I could experiment with mirroring two MySQL servers.  I then installed Joomla, Wordpress, and MediaWiki on the webserver pointing their databases at the MySQL server on the second.  Performance overall was very impressive given the specs of the machine with three guests running at once.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it so far, but pretty cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2006/10/04/69/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Weekend with Vista</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2006/09/19/68</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2006/09/19/68#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 03:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bradc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Solaris]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other OS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2006/09/19/68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while ago I registered to download the RC versions of Windows Vista.  Recently Microsoft released RC1 of Vista and I received an email with a product-key and a link to download the ISO.   So why would a Linux/UNIX/Mac guy want to bother with such a thing?  I believe it is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while ago I registered to download the RC versions of Windows Vista.  Recently Microsoft released RC1 of Vista and I received an email with a product-key and a link to download the ISO.   So why would a Linux/UNIX/Mac guy want to bother with such a thing?  I believe it is good to see what new things are coming, what the competition is doing, and what all the hype is about.    I also wanted to compare Microsoft&#8217;s latest to some of the more recent stuff from Linux.</p>
<p><em>:: Try 1 - The Tower ::</em></p>
<p>My first attempt at installing Vista was on my test PC.  1.7 Ghz P4 processor with 1GB of RAM and an Nvidia GeForce FX 5500 video card and 2 NIC&#8217;s (1 netgear, 1 d-link).   Vista gives this PC a performance rating of 2.  Neither of the NIC&#8217;s worked on Vista so I had no access to the net, which was extremely disappointing.  Aero Glass (the flashy GUI) worked but was really sluggish, which was a little surprising.</p>
<p>Aero Glass itself is a little disappointing.  It pretty much consists of the following: Transparent traskbar, start menu and window borders, Thumbnails of minimized applications when you hover your mouse over them, and scrolling through your open applications in a rolodex fashion.  There are probably other features but those were the most noticeable.  So, really  nothing too exciting or new.  MS fanboys like to criticize Xgl/Compiz as being all eye-candy and nothing real in terms of usability, which really isn&#8217;t the case at all.</p>
<p>So to these usability experts I ask, what is the usability of having a transparent window border? Oh, what&#8230;it&#8217;s just eye-candy&#8230;there to keep up with MacOSX in terms of flash.  Lets talk about the ridiculous usability nightmare of scrolling through your applications in a rolodex fashion.  Since they couldn&#8217;t just come out and copy Apple&#8217;s expose feature they came up with this brilliant idea instead.  It&#8217;s a little tricky to use, especially when using the scroll wheel.  You don&#8217;t get a good overview of all your open windows and it&#8217;s sometimes hard to pick the one you want. So, let&#8217;s say that the window you actually want to have focus is in the back of the rolodex? You have to scroll through all of them to get to it (and that&#8217;s if you don&#8217;t scroll past it or accidentally select the wrong window). Unlike expose which nicely lays out your open windows as convenient thumbnails across your entire screen making it easy to see ALL open windows at once and select the one you want.</p>
<p><em>:: Try 2 - The Laptop ::</em></p>
<p>Given that neither of my two NIC&#8217;s worked in the tower on Vista I decided (for some stupid reason) to install it on my laptop.   The laptop is a Dell 700m 1.8 Ghz Pentium M processor with 1GB of RAM integrated Intel Pro Wireless, and Intel integrated graphics card.   This laptop was running Novell&#8217;s Suse Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 (SLED10) which I installed on it after I found out that the Xgl/Compiz shipped with SLED10 &#8220;just works&#8221;  even on the Intel integreated graphics card!  The graphics weren&#8217;t as fast as when used on the Nvidia card on my tower but it was faster than I expected and worked really well (a pleasant surprise).</p>
<p>I download the latest GParted LiveCD (version 0.3) which was extremely slick!  I used it to resize my SLED10 partition  and basically split the 40GB drive in the laptop.  It worked like a charm.  Before I started my Vista install I was able to still boot into SLED10 without any problems.</p>
<p>Unfortunately Vista (like all other MS operating systems before it) do not play nice with other operating systems on the same drive&#8230;so I ended up just trashing the entire partitioning scheme and starting from scratch installing Vista on the front of the drive and leaving an empty partition at the end of the drive to reinstall Linux into.  I had a feeling this was going to be the case but I really wanted to try out the GParted LiveCD to see how well it worked.</p>
<p>Given the spec&#8217;s on the laptop above, Vista blesses it a performance rating of 1.  Aero Glass does not work, making a rather dull system even more boring.  This was disappointing considering that Xgl/Compiz run on it just fine and reasonably well. Fortunately though the wireless on the latop worked out of the box (though to be fair it also worked out of the box on SLED10 and also the last two releases of Ubuntu so in itself not a big deal).</p>
<p>Vista, like all Windows releases before it, comes with basically no applications.  This even though it was installed from a DVD and requires a &#8220;40GB hard disk with at least 15GB free&#8221; to install!  Why so much space?  During my initial try at installing it on the laptop Vista would not continue the install because apparently the 15 GB I had allocated for it were not enough (hence the deleting all partitions and starting from scratch).  This, to me, is yet another reason why open systems are way better than proprietary closed systems.  I mean really&#8230;I can strip down either Linux or Solaris 10 and install them on just a few gigs.</p>
<p>IE7 sucks&#8230;The layout of the interface is terrible and in terms of features it has nothing on Firefox (especially the beta&#8217;s for version 2) or Opera.  It is also interesting to note that without Aero Glass IE7 does not display thumbnails of the pages when you hover over the tabs (something Opera does already anyway).  After playing with IE7 for a while&#8230;giving it the benefit of the doubt&#8230;I promptly headed over to mozilla.org and downloaded the latest beta for Firefox 2.  There were articles a while ago about MS apparently offering to assist Mozilla in getting Firefox ready for Vista (???) so I wanted to see what they really needed to do to get Firefox to work on Vista&#8230;I was almost expecting it to not work at all.  Fortunately for me it worked famously.  I also proceeded to install OpenOffice.org 2 Novell Edition to see how well it worked on Vista, and of course it worked just fine.</p>
<p><em>:: Back to Ubuntu ::</em></p>
<p>So after my little adventure with Vista I installed Ubuntu Edgy Knot 3 in that extra partition I created at the end of the drive during the Vista install.  Surprisingly Ubuntu automatically mounted my Vista partition even though it is NTFS and added an entry in the bootloader (Grub) for Vista (and even labeled it as Vista).  Now if only MS would be that kind when there are other operating systems on the same computer.   I continue to be impressed with Ubuntu and I believe we are continuing to see the fruits of all the optimization work being done to GNOME because on both my systems running Edgy right now GNOME is just really fast.</p>
<p><em>:: Vista Conclusion ::</em></p>
<p>Vista&#8217;s Sidebar? It&#8217;s okay I guess, I mean&#8230;they are just widgets nothing earth shattering (OS X widgets, gDesklets, etc.).  The new start menu I like&#8230;much better than the default on XP.  The default theme is much better than XP too, at least I don&#8217;t feel like I am using a computer purchased from Fisher Price.   The integrated search is okay, not nearly as  cool or flexible as Gnome&#8217;s Deskbar applet (which rocks I must say, and I use all the time), especially when used with Beagle Live searching.  The first user is still by default the administrator&#8230;but you have to click a dialog box that pops up anytime you want to change any settings.  A step in the right direction I guess (???), though I have heard this can be disabled so what&#8217;s the point.</p>
<p>Overall it&#8217;s okay and probably a good step in the right direction for MS but I don&#8217;t think OS X has anything to worry about (not even comparing it to the upcoming OS X release early next year) and Linux has proven to me that it can contend with much of Vista already (again, not comparing it to who knows what advances will be made in Linux by early next year).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2006/09/19/68/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finally! Netbeans on Xgl&#8230;Woohoo!</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2006/08/27/67</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2006/08/27/67#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bradc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2006/08/27/67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally, with recent release of Sun&#8217;s JDK 5.0 Update 8 I can run Netbeans on my systems running Xgl!!!  It was such a pain having to open Netbeans in a seperate Xnest window to do any development (or use one of my none-Xgl systems, hooray for the Mac!).

[Upstart]
It appears that Ubuntu is working on an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, with recent release of Sun&#8217;s JDK 5.0 Update 8 I can run Netbeans on my systems running Xgl!!!  It was such a pain having to open Netbeans in a seperate Xnest window to do any development (or use one of my none-Xgl systems, hooray for the Mac!).</p>
<p><img alt="Netbeans on Xgl" title="Netbeans on Xgl" src="http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/08/xgl_netbeans.jpg" /></p>
<p><strong>[Upstart]</strong></p>
<p>It appears that Ubuntu is working on an init daemon replacement called <a title="Upstart" href="http://www.netsplit.com/blog/work/canonical/upstart.html">Upstart</a>.  All I can say is it is about time!  Apple replaced it a while ago with <a title="launchd" href="http://developer.apple.com/macosx/launchd.html">launchd</a> and Sun replaced it with <a title="smf" href="http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/content/selfheal/sdev_intro.html">smf</a>.  I have been wondering how long it would take for a mainstream distribution to come up with an init replacement.</p>
<p>Upstart has been recently added to the Universe repository for Ubuntu for testing.  They are hoping that Upstart will be ready to intially replace the init system by the time Edgy is released.  By the time Edgy+1 is released they are hoping to have it completely replace cron, atd, anacron, and inetd.  Then by Edgy+2 they are saying that no new packages will be accepted unless they provide upstart jobs instead of init scripts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2006/08/27/67/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Future Computer Interfaces</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2006/08/07/65</link>
		<comments>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2006/08/07/65#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 03:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bradc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2006/08/07/65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the weekend I saw a link on Digg pointing to &#8220;Multi-Touch Interaction Research&#8220;.   Rather than interacting with a touch screen with a single pointer they are working on interfaces that allow you to manipulate objects on the screen with more than one finger/pointer at a time.
After watchcing the video on the site [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the weekend I saw a link on Digg pointing to &#8220;<a href="http://mrl.nyu.edu/~jhan/ftirtouch/"><font face="Helvetica">Multi-Touch Interaction Research</font></a>&#8220;.   Rather than interacting with a touch screen with a single pointer they are working on interfaces that allow you to manipulate objects on the screen with more than one finger/pointer at a time.</p>
<p>After watchcing the video on the site it reminded me of the <a href="http://honeybrown.ca/Pubs/BumpTop.html">BumpTop Prototype</a> video that made it&#8217;s way around the web a little while ago.  In the same vein is <a href="http://macslow.thepimp.net/?page_id=18"><em>&#8220;</em>lowfat<em>&#8220;</em></a>, which looks equally interesting. There is also, <a href="http://people.freedesktop.org/~krh/akamaru.git/">Akamaru</a> another physics engine prototype I ran across earlier which has a demo of a dock application where the icons behave with real physical interaction.</p>
<p>Obviously none of this stuff in it&#8217;s current form is &#8220;productive&#8221; or &#8220;serves any real purpose&#8221; (I love the idiots that see stuff like this and say &#8220;looks fun but doesn&#8217;t look like it&#8217;s usable&#8221;&#8230;it&#8217;s called a prototype for a reason!) but I can already envision a good mixture of some of this technology with a more contemporary desktop environment and some of the effects from Xgl/compiz on linux.</p>
<p>Imagine switching virtual desktops (sorry Apple, I mean &#8220;Spaces&#8221;) by grabbing the side of the screen and dragging the cube around like in Xgl but with your hands.  Or better yet, with one hand holding onto an open application and the other flipping the cube around to place that application on another desktop.  How about sorting through your file manager by physically manipulating your files on the screen, where the other files around react like true phyiscal objects.  Or maybe changing the current applcation with focus by pushing/pulling applications to the background/foreground&#8230;the possibilties are endless!  It makes me wonder what kind of interface my 1 month old son will use even by the time he gets to high school&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linuxreview.net/blog/2006/08/07/65/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
